" Q had over 4000 opportunities to validate “Ghost” and never did." Think about that: why would Q "dox or blow the cover" of an ally -- much less his own?
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Read what I wrote carefully.
I never said I bought into the "E C-W = Q" bit. In fact, I closed with, "YMMV"...
Most of what I wrote, I have sauce for.
My purpose was to highlight that GenFlynn's aide now controls all Mil Intel, and that he had long been referred to in QDrops. That, to me, is encouraging.
I agree: the "@EzraGhost" persona is unverified, as is its sure connection with E C-W.
Perhaps those with Twitter chops could check to see if "@EzraGhost" has been axed -- along with all other POTUS supporters.
I have zero doubt that E C-W is of significant importance at this time. Now, at least, FReeQs will recognize his name if it pops up again...
As I said, "YMMV"...
TXnMA
” Q had over 4000 opportunities to validate “Ghost” and never did.”
Think about that: why would Q “dox or blow the cover” of an ally — much less his own?
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sorry I wasn’t clear - I’m reading and posting on spare minutes here ‘n there.
At present, without Q posting (whom I believe is a group rather than an individual like ECW), and no outside comms, the only Q relevant content is coming from peeps like Trump or Scavino - we read and parse and look at pictures etc. Why would ECW need to do anything separate or different from what they are doing? If ECW posts crumbs as the others do - no one is doxxed.
For those who believe ECW is Q, why wouldn’t he use 8k and avoid “outside comms”. He doesn’t have reason to trust public platforms to maintain his anonymity - big tech or hackers would compromise his identity.
If Q wants to, Q can post on 8K, the only platform they (apparently) trust/guard. If operations are too sensitive for Q to post right now, it would then be too risky for ECW to post on an outside platform (no outside comms).
Even if Ghost is capitalized, and even if it was paired with references to ECW (I haven’t read the drops yet, but thanks for the drop numbers), it doesn’t mean this outside comm is legitimately ECW. If, as you’ve pointed out, others believe this to be ECW, then larpers/shills would likely know and find it ideal to use it for ill purposes.
I haven’t had time to find the video link posted on thread about 3 weeks ago (it’s not the days, it’s the mileage!) but either E or GhostECW posted a dark video that someone linked and I watched. Yoo Hoo?! The person that posted that link, can you send it to me via email or on thread again? ThankQ!