>>Then losing 61 court cases trying to prove fraud just puts the nails in the coffin.
Cases were denied, they weren’t heard. Was there a presenation and refutation of evidence?
Cases were denied, they weren’t heard. Was there a presenation and refutation of evidence?
There were absolutely badly stated cases, and drafts submitted, and poor arguments. However, there were also plenty of cases where they have witnesses that said they saw wrongdoing, and asked for access to records, and to ballots for them to be examined. The judge has a role in settling arguments about how far these accesses go and the conditions under which they are handled to preserve the documents. The judges are completely wrong just to say ‘no’ and deny discovery.