That’s part of my concern. No time to investigate anything objectively & mutually. Trump made assertions, GA made opposing assertions, and there’s 2 days to resolve it all. Trying to view it neutrally, nothing persuasive either way - except for a few full-on disqualifying situations, such as counting boxed votes after observers were persuaded to leave (that might be enough right there to tip to Trump via disqualification).
It was apparent that there was no detailed agenda for the meeting. Trump just rambled and GA was only too happy to let him go on and on. I realize executive meetings are dominated by the principles and they can run loose but usually there is at least a framework of agenda items everyone is looking at and focused on.
There should have a set agenda to discuss the groups of numbers in detail and get GA on the record with specifics and detailed actions to follow. They ended up with one action on only one group of numbers - all eggs in one basket.
As it was GA was able to let Trump go on for 10 minutes at a time saying the same things over and over. Then they could just say they simply disagreed. GA often got off the hook too easy.
A high level type meeting like this might have been possibly OK in November. Might. But it is now pretty late in the game for this.