I am angry too. Going back 20 to 30 years, the Democrats were suing to overturn elections. They got judges to allow recounts after recount until they were ahead. Then when they winning, arguing the counting needs to stop because the process has gone on long enough. Hugh Hewitt wrote "If It's Not Close, They Can't Cheat" in 2004 over this.
Now the Democrats commit fraud in the exact same way, in multiple state, and no one has standing in court to challenge it. Article 2 of the Constitution only counts when it is not to hot for the Supreme Court to handle.
We are all angry right now. At least he is trying to do something about it.
“He is angry he is getting nowhere in court, and is having a temper tantrum in public over it.”
We all get angry and frustrated, but at no time do I announce that someone will arise from the dead....except Sunday morning at church.....
My point was he’s a highly capable effective attorney....his recent behavior hasn’t reflected this.....In fact, quite the opposite dipping into the bizarre.....
I am angry too. Going back 20 to 30 years, the Democrats were suing to overturn elections. They got judges to allow recounts after recount until they were ahead. Then when they winning, arguing the counting needs to stop because the process has gone on long enough. Hugh Hewitt wrote “If It’s Not Close, They Can’t Cheat” in 2004 over this.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
After losing the ‘hanging chad’ didn’t the LIBS claim ‘never again’ and started working on getting ‘their’ AGs in office?
Just like ANY elections,
if the R wins 59-41 it is too close to call
If the D wins .5000009-.5000001 it is a D runaway.
AND Rs basically sit back and allow it to play out, all in so called ‘fairness’.
Also after most elections there is an ‘investigation’ and promise to cleanse the books, wiping out non citizens, those that died or moved with MONEY being spent and come the next election the same charade is played over again.