Is this Pompeo/Ratcliffe with our other NatSec guy (I can’t recall his name, right now)?
Basically in my limited understanding, he’s saying the irreducible fractions
should be occurring naturally and they are not.
Video 35m suggest playback speed 1.25. Other links included.
Start at 10m if you get the Euler function, 15m to skip most the math. Strong Language.
11m Georgia,
19m Pennsylvania
20m Michigan live, “They predetermined a winner.”
Result: the ‘Expected’ vs what I ‘get’, the columns to observe.
GCD Greatest Common Denominator
Unleashing the Kraken; God Bless the Republic.
https://rumble.com/vcj491-unleashing-the-kraken-god-bless-the-republic..html
When you do Trump divided by the total.
32m
“Twice as many irreducible fractions as is allowed to be.”
“That’s proof right there of wide spread algorithmic fraud.”
“It still is supposed to conform to Euler’s Totient Theorem.”