It appears that you believe Lin Wood.
You say, no way would he say these things without proof.
Yet you have not seen any proof at all and believe him anyway.
So Lin Wood doesn’t have to prove anything because you and others believe him without proof.
Months into years......and you’ll never see a drop of proof from Lin Wood.
Re: 158 - the most concise post yet on Lin Wood (and could be extended to J. Pulitzer, ET al) and his providing evidence for his claims.
Blows my sophomoric attempts out of the water.
And also sets a high bar for those explaining why he has not or does not have to provide evidence of his claims.
Thanks for posting.
Where ya been, on vacation?
Missed ya lots.

We will see who is right!