10 day audit = 10 days darkness?
10 DAY AUDIT!
“The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been conducted illegally.
“In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns.
“We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.
***************************
Too drawn out...crooked congress...crooked justices.
Not sure I like this.
10 DAY AUDIT!
That might force the states to decertify the fraud electors.
We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit ...
_______________________________________________________
Partial quote from Q drop #15 -
“The corruption that will come out is so serious that deals must be cut for people to walk away otherwise 70% of elected politicians would be in jail ...”
You idea would be fantastic if only 70% of those in charge weren’t dirty. Given that they’re now deeply into self-preservation mode, I wouldn’t trust their audit findings.
I like this idea if it can be done.
I just don’t see the House voting for any alternative slate or throwing out a slate of electors for any state.