A RequestWhile I am responding to the following post by aMorePerfectUnion, my comments are intended for the group. Here's an excerpt: Post away and we’ll use our skills to beat it to a pulp and see if there’s any truth there. We are capable. In this case we do d that, as we have thousands of times already. As far as the opinions of the non-FReeQs go, they already distort everything, so I don’t care what their opinions are. Just read the keywords at the beginning of the thread. They are purposefully in darkness. 1,686 posted on 1/3/2021, 4:39:43 PM by aMorePerfectUnion ( ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
With so much happening, I hope the thread will not invest in dead topics (no pun intended). The speculative content has been raise repeatedly already and without information, just lies there twitchy. "He's dead, Jim." If I am sadly mistaken, I will soon have my comeuppance when it is revealed. But with the republic swaying on a high bridge, why return to speculative theories already discussed at length, urging adoption from those who have previously reviewed it and passed on to other topics?
The JFK Jr. is alive theories are not Q content in that they are based on a fake anon post, and pictures of unknown persons publicly crossing the White House lawn in front of spectators and photographers. Q said, "no outside channels." Links on our threads seem to increasingly focus on sources that conflict with or replace Q. Those sources have never been banned from the forum so it's possible to have a thriving thread there involving more FReepers and discussion.
Q advocates free thought.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma." It's hard to defend the use of content based on authority, revelation, tradition or dogma because that is what the MSM has used to force our society to the ground, where we currently fighting for freedom, struggling to rise. I hope to avoid returning to the ground now, treating anonymous sources without Q's validation efforts as authoritative, when we're winning bigly. I like what you wrote about "using our skills to beat it to a pulp and see if there's any truth there." Lately, I've been concerned to see that it hasn't been working. FReeQs can demonstrate the speculative content lacks evidence or is provided by analysts who hate Q, and the answer I'm increasingly seeing which seems to be evolving to become the idea, "It doesn't matter". That's how we got here with the MSM and our "selected officials." Originally, the JFK Jr. theory posted on earlier threads linked to a an old chan post. I pointed to ways that the JFK Jr. post departed from JFK Jr's education and professional background (publisher of a magazine). No one refuted that content to present a plausible way that it COULD be JFK Jr. The request for evidence is ignored. I've seen the request for reasoning and evidence dimissed as "arguing" when in fact it's exactly the attempt to "use our skills to beat it to pulp." I'm not linking examples because it's a group mindset I see evolving; I'm asking all for a general cooperative effort to keep our thread mission focused.
We're near victory, and through our varied interests and abilities, we seem to be fanning out instead of pulling together. More links invite us to replace Q content as our center of effort, with content from those who despise Q content and dismiss Anons as crazy or stupid. We can get called "crazy" and "stupid" by MSM and social media any time, anywhere. What we have here research thread to work on ideas without that noise. I would not use the terminology or form of address that TXnMA used. My thoughts don't match his when I read this content. But my concerns about focusing on our mission align with his. I ask that we separate out speculative content. Since our thread was locked for 9/11 conspiracy theories, I can't say I know how the board owner feels about forum posts speculating that JFK Jr. is alive. Unless Jim Rob lumps JFK Jr. is alive speculative content into what he calls "crazy conspiracy theories" (which got our threads locked), I recommend JFK Jr. is alive content be posted outside the Q threads. Otherwise, I request that the "JRK Jr." speculation be shared via email. C'mon we're so close! THISCLOSE!
Stay together!
WWG1WGA 
| 