Replies

Aha, I forgot about him, he is great, I must check him often. Below is the unrolled thread, thanks for link. In the first one, what is “dap”? Missing are images, at link.

J.B. White
@RattlerGator

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1341415959706349572.html

1 of 40

I want to publicly walk through an exercise that gives our Attorney General his full dap & then allow that positivity to project forward how his “resignation” letter may serve the President & fit within a timeline leading to Trump’s inauguration on January 20th – okay?
2 of 40

This means you read it, apply your own healthy skepticism to it, and respond on the basis of what your reasoning tells you.
3 of 40

When engaged in such an exercise I try to apply my personal mantra to both center me *and* my analysis.

There are nine components I use to try and orient myself.
4 of 40

[1] Patience.

[2] Preparation.

[3] Perseverance.

[4] Attention to Detail.

[5] Flexibility.

[6] Resiliency.

[7] Never think that God’s delays are God’s denials.

[8] Hold on; hold fast; hold out.

[9] Patience is genius.
5 of 40

I’m not anal about any of these components. Being human, I’m neither faithful to nor slave to any of them at all times. First among equals, however, is lucky number 7.

Never think that God’s delays are God’s denials.
6 of 40

Because I believe Providence *is* at work, I read Barr’s letter as a contingent document that leaves room for changed circumstances as well as his remaining on the job as Attorney General, if needed.
7 of 40

The first paragraph to me is all important and tells us everything we need to know.

One paragraph, two sentences.

How hard are they to comprehend?

Apparently, the media (and they aren’t alone) is incapable of doing so. Let us take a look.
8 of 40

Paragraph 1, Sentence 1:

“I appreciate the opportunity to update you this afternoon on the Department’s review of voter fraud allegations in the 2020 election and how these allegations will *continue* to be pursued.”
9 of 40

Paragraph 1, Sentence 2:

“At a time when the country is so deeply divided, it is incumbent on all levels of government, and all agencies acting within their purview, to do all we can to assure the integrity of elections and promote public confidence in their outcome.”
10 of 40

So . . . .

Allegations will continue to be pursued and the integrity of elections will remain a focus, as will promoting public confidence in their outcome.
11 of 40

Remember, it was a friendly letter with a friendly response from the President.
12 of 40

Do people honestly believe this man has broken with his President?

Honestly ???

The man who blocked the angry Democrats within the Mueller Special Counsel’s Office from publishing a conclusion not supported by the facts of the investigation?

I don’t think so.
13 of 40

So, giving him his full dap, what might he be up to ???
14 of 40

Well, we’ve had an election. The results are being heavily contested. And some very important, constitutionally-mandated, events are upcoming.
15 of 40

Allegations of foreign interference are everywhere.

Allegations of impermissible partisanship and illegal election support are self-evident.

What’s an A.G. to do to assist the nations’ Chief Law Enforcement Officer – President Trump – in protecting the nation, hmmmm?
16 of 40

I say he turns over day-to-day responsibility for the Department of Justice to a lieutenant and he gives total focus, even if behind the scenes, to President Trump and Vice President Pence.
17 of 40

You may recall that Mike Pence is President of the Senate – correct?
18 of 40

As such, he’s not simply *a* constitutional officer when it comes to the election process of our President – he’s *the* constitutional officer.
19 of 40

He’s not subject to the dictates of the Supreme Court, nor the Speaker of the House, nor the Senate Majority Leader.
20 of 40

He stands alone.
21 of 40

I suspect Attorney General William Barr needs to be free to assist this constitutional officer in carrying out the monumental duty confronting him in the face of this outrageous attempt at a communistic takeover.
22 of 40

On January 3rd, a new Congress meets and is sworn in to organize for the new Session.
23 of 40

Will those oaths have new meaning for these elected officials?

Will “X” number of Democrats see the writing on the wall and say hell no to this crazy Joe Biden bullshit?

I expect they will.

In numbers that surprise the media and the globalists, etc.
24 of 40

Charges of treason coming from competent professionals who have all along showed the nation they will *not* concede to fraud have a way of focusing the brain of a glad-handing politician.

Whether Democrat or Republican.
25 of 40

Current uncontested number of electors: Trump has 232, Biden 227.

Because properly appointed electors may not ever total the needed 270 number & the constitutionally-proper vote for Prez then goes to the House, the majority state delegations are: GOP 27, Democrats 20.
26 of 40

“X” number of Dems, who have apparently already signed off (quite stupidly) on this communistic takeover, will surely be inclined to bitch & moan but how many sober Democrats will sing the “Hellz to the Nah Nah” song ???

Hmmmmmmmmmm ???

27 of 40

Ultimately, it doesn’t matter.

The conclusion is certain.

Only the most partisan Democrats and the most fearful Republicans don’t get this.
28 of 40

I’ve seen William Barr shrug off Democrat stupidity before.

29 of 40

I’m ready to see it again, if needed, in assistance to Mike Pence who may be dealing with the dumbest of dumb objections . . . while the entire nation is watching.

If the Democrats are smart, they won’t come close to pushing this.

We’re totally tired of the BS!
30 of 40

In that very first week of the new Congress, will there be joint Judiciary Committee hearings into the question of 2020 election cycle fraud and Big Tech partisan interference?

Perhaps.
31 of 40

Will there be a joint Homeland Security hearing on United States Postal Service election cycle fraud?

Perhaps.
32 of 40

Interestingly, Kevin Clinesmith is scheduled for sentencing January 7th – is it just me, y’all, or is that convenient as hell?
33 of 40

In the best approximation of Donald Trump’s “I caught them all” statement . . . shouldn’t Clinesmith’s overly generous plea be reconsidered?

Shouldn’t it !?!

Shouldn’t Trump / Barr / DOJ pull something of a playground move and suddenly shout . . . PSYCH !!!
Image
34 of 40

On behalf of a righteously pissed off nation, shouldn’t the United States government reject his plea?

Thus opening the door to a proper administration of justice for his outrageous crime?
35 of 40

Shouldn’t that proper administration of justice extend to Sally Yates and an entire range of Obama Administration officials?
36 of 40

Yes, of course it should.
37 of 40

Because he caught them.

He caught them all.
38 of 40

Confusion, my friends. Confusion to the enemy.

Never, ever underestimate Donald John Trump.

Never, ever presume incompetence by lawyers working for Donald John Trump.
39 of 40

Until proven otherwise, that’s my story and I’m sticking with it.

But I hope y’all understand, this analysis works whether Barr himself does this *or* DOJ, under new leadership, does this.

Capisce !?!
40 of 40

My next multiple thread, hopefully posted tonight, will try to explain why the President’s December 2nd video / speech was as he indicated . . . perhaps the most important of his Presidency.