Posted on 12/21/2020 1:28:45 AM PST by ransomnote
Aha, I forgot about him, he is great, I must check him often. Below is the unrolled thread, thanks for link. In the first one, what is “dap”? Missing are images, at link.
J.B. White
@RattlerGator
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1341415959706349572.html
1 of 40
I want to publicly walk through an exercise that gives our Attorney General his full dap & then allow that positivity to project forward how his “resignation” letter may serve the President & fit within a timeline leading to Trump’s inauguration on January 20th – okay?
2 of 40
This means you read it, apply your own healthy skepticism to it, and respond on the basis of what your reasoning tells you.
3 of 40
When engaged in such an exercise I try to apply my personal mantra to both center me *and* my analysis.
There are nine components I use to try and orient myself.
4 of 40
[1] Patience.
[2] Preparation.
[3] Perseverance.
[4] Attention to Detail.
[5] Flexibility.
[6] Resiliency.
[7] Never think that God’s delays are God’s denials.
[8] Hold on; hold fast; hold out.
[9] Patience is genius.
5 of 40
I’m not anal about any of these components. Being human, I’m neither faithful to nor slave to any of them at all times. First among equals, however, is lucky number 7.
Never think that God’s delays are God’s denials.
6 of 40
Because I believe Providence *is* at work, I read Barr’s letter as a contingent document that leaves room for changed circumstances as well as his remaining on the job as Attorney General, if needed.
7 of 40
The first paragraph to me is all important and tells us everything we need to know.
One paragraph, two sentences.
How hard are they to comprehend?
Apparently, the media (and they aren’t alone) is incapable of doing so. Let us take a look.
8 of 40
Paragraph 1, Sentence 1:
“I appreciate the opportunity to update you this afternoon on the Department’s review of voter fraud allegations in the 2020 election and how these allegations will *continue* to be pursued.”
9 of 40
Paragraph 1, Sentence 2:
“At a time when the country is so deeply divided, it is incumbent on all levels of government, and all agencies acting within their purview, to do all we can to assure the integrity of elections and promote public confidence in their outcome.”
10 of 40
So . . . .
Allegations will continue to be pursued and the integrity of elections will remain a focus, as will promoting public confidence in their outcome.
11 of 40
Remember, it was a friendly letter with a friendly response from the President.
12 of 40
Do people honestly believe this man has broken with his President?
Honestly ???
The man who blocked the angry Democrats within the Mueller Special Counsel’s Office from publishing a conclusion not supported by the facts of the investigation?
I don’t think so.
13 of 40
So, giving him his full dap, what might he be up to ???
14 of 40
Well, we’ve had an election. The results are being heavily contested. And some very important, constitutionally-mandated, events are upcoming.
15 of 40
Allegations of foreign interference are everywhere.
Allegations of impermissible partisanship and illegal election support are self-evident.
What’s an A.G. to do to assist the nations’ Chief Law Enforcement Officer – President Trump – in protecting the nation, hmmmm?
16 of 40
I say he turns over day-to-day responsibility for the Department of Justice to a lieutenant and he gives total focus, even if behind the scenes, to President Trump and Vice President Pence.
17 of 40
You may recall that Mike Pence is President of the Senate – correct?
18 of 40
As such, he’s not simply *a* constitutional officer when it comes to the election process of our President – he’s *the* constitutional officer.
19 of 40
He’s not subject to the dictates of the Supreme Court, nor the Speaker of the House, nor the Senate Majority Leader.
20 of 40
He stands alone.
21 of 40
I suspect Attorney General William Barr needs to be free to assist this constitutional officer in carrying out the monumental duty confronting him in the face of this outrageous attempt at a communistic takeover.
22 of 40
On January 3rd, a new Congress meets and is sworn in to organize for the new Session.
23 of 40
Will those oaths have new meaning for these elected officials?
Will “X” number of Democrats see the writing on the wall and say hell no to this crazy Joe Biden bullshit?
I expect they will.
In numbers that surprise the media and the globalists, etc.
24 of 40
Charges of treason coming from competent professionals who have all along showed the nation they will *not* concede to fraud have a way of focusing the brain of a glad-handing politician.
Whether Democrat or Republican.
25 of 40
Current uncontested number of electors: Trump has 232, Biden 227.
Because properly appointed electors may not ever total the needed 270 number & the constitutionally-proper vote for Prez then goes to the House, the majority state delegations are: GOP 27, Democrats 20.
26 of 40
“X” number of Dems, who have apparently already signed off (quite stupidly) on this communistic takeover, will surely be inclined to bitch & moan but how many sober Democrats will sing the “Hellz to the Nah Nah” song ???
Hmmmmmmmmmm ???
27 of 40
Ultimately, it doesn’t matter.
The conclusion is certain.
Only the most partisan Democrats and the most fearful Republicans don’t get this.
28 of 40
I’ve seen William Barr shrug off Democrat stupidity before.
29 of 40
I’m ready to see it again, if needed, in assistance to Mike Pence who may be dealing with the dumbest of dumb objections . . . while the entire nation is watching.
If the Democrats are smart, they won’t come close to pushing this.
We’re totally tired of the BS!
30 of 40
In that very first week of the new Congress, will there be joint Judiciary Committee hearings into the question of 2020 election cycle fraud and Big Tech partisan interference?
Perhaps.
31 of 40
Will there be a joint Homeland Security hearing on United States Postal Service election cycle fraud?
Perhaps.
32 of 40
Interestingly, Kevin Clinesmith is scheduled for sentencing January 7th – is it just me, y’all, or is that convenient as hell?
33 of 40
In the best approximation of Donald Trump’s “I caught them all” statement . . . shouldn’t Clinesmith’s overly generous plea be reconsidered?
Shouldn’t it !?!
Shouldn’t Trump / Barr / DOJ pull something of a playground move and suddenly shout . . . PSYCH !!!
Image
34 of 40
On behalf of a righteously pissed off nation, shouldn’t the United States government reject his plea?
Thus opening the door to a proper administration of justice for his outrageous crime?
35 of 40
Shouldn’t that proper administration of justice extend to Sally Yates and an entire range of Obama Administration officials?
36 of 40
Yes, of course it should.
37 of 40
Because he caught them.
He caught them all.
38 of 40
Confusion, my friends. Confusion to the enemy.
Never, ever underestimate Donald John Trump.
Never, ever presume incompetence by lawyers working for Donald John Trump.
39 of 40
Until proven otherwise, that’s my story and I’m sticking with it.
But I hope y’all understand, this analysis works whether Barr himself does this *or* DOJ, under new leadership, does this.
Capisce !?!
40 of 40
My next multiple thread, hopefully posted tonight, will try to explain why the President’s December 2nd video / speech was as he indicated . . . perhaps the most important of his Presidency.
Cletus.D.Yokel wrote:
“Congressional agreement prior to deploying military on US soil.”
Them adding this in, means they think PDJT might just use it.
Another reason for him to veto that bill.
And IIRC, VA was called way early, with just a small percentage of the vote counted.
TXnMA wrote:
“You’re welcome!
“No question that VA should be, if not on Navarro’s list, at least part of the discussion.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You’re absolutely correct. (The data examples of weighted-race ratio fraud I used HERE were from VA...
TXnMA “
sail?
Mitch is doing an insane, criminal act!!!
Would this be grounds for PDJT to take action?
Cletus.D.Yokel wrote:
“THIS CANNOT HAPPEN!!!!
What if Trump is returned to office????
//////He will have 2 sets of Senate approved administration members. /////
Cocaine Mitch is FORCING a Constitutional crisis by taking this action.
This is SEDITION!!!!!!
McConnell WILL be detained on charges of treason as will all Senators that vote for these shadow nominees.
THIS CANNOT STAND!!!!!!!!”
Cletus.D.Yokel wrote:
“
:: but I will put them on the floor ::
This is TREASON.
An insult to the Constitution.
A violation of his oath of office.
If they come to the floor, it is conspiracy to SEDITION!
“
“sail?”
***************************************
The thingy that sticks up with the wing thingys on it
That’s what that tall thingy on top of the sub is called, apologies for the technical stuff
.
I see we both studied the same tech manuals.
I just read J.B.White’s thread. He says new House sworn in Jan.3. I thought their term starts Jan.20. WIll look. I was wrong. Stars Jan.3 But what about the stolen seats, I just can’t stop worrying about that.
https://www.house.gov/legislative-activity
NOTE: A new Congress begins at noon January 3 of each odd-numbered year following a general election, unless it designates a different day by law. A Congress lasts for two years, with each year constituting a separate session. A congressional calendar is an agenda or list of business awaiting possible action by the House or Senate.
Studied??!?!!
If there is some resolution to this that I miss, ping me. I never heard of such a thing, voting on appointments for a pres who is not pres (what to speak of never will be).
Found on that thread, Rep Cawthorn of NC will contest the election:
https://twitter.com/philiptirino/status/1341071653850234881
Well said.
And I believe Barr isn’t going anywhere. He is just taking some time off for Christmas. It’s a head fake.
From that article:
“...But it could be more than pardons. Yesterday Barr suggested there were several things he wouldn’t do that Trump wanted him to do as AG...
5. ...ranging from appointing special counsels for Hunter Biden or election fraud, to giving a legal ok for seizing voting machines or for various types of Insurrection Act-type moves by the president. Can one be confident Barr’s successor as AG, Jeffrey Rosen, will also say no?
6. I’m told not. I’m told the very ambitious Rosen has pushed on earlier occasions for carrying out Trump’s will only to be stopped by Barr. And people who’ve worked with Rosen say they wouldn’t be surprised to see him, as AG, hasten to try to do Trump’s will.
7. In the past, Rosen has been allied with some in the White House counsel’s office and others elsewhere in the White House who’ve been for going whole hog for Trump, as a friend put it. They’ve run up against resistance from Barr but also from WH Counsel Pat Cipollone.
8. The departure of Cipollone would be a signal, as one person put it, that “all bets are off.”
9. I’m also reliably told senior military officials in the Pentagon are more, not less, alarmed than they were a few weeks ago when Mark Esper was fired. The new crew of Trump loyalists in the most senior civilian positions don’t seem there only to burnish their resumes, as...
10. ...one person put it. They’re trying to figure out, in coordination with people in the White House, “how to make things happen.” The senior military obviously retain considerable clout, to say the least. But the discussions they’re having among themselves are unprecedented—
11. ...more sober and weighty than those of 1974 in the weeks before Nixon’s resignation. And the difference is that Jim Schlesinger was then Secretary of Defense, committed to checking an unstable and desperate president, not to helping one.
12. All of these alarms, one hopes and trusts, will come to nothing, or at least to not too much. And the coup, in the end, will fail. But that something more than we’ve seen so far won’t be tried—of that people aren’t so confident.
13. The first thing to look for is what, if anything, happens on Dec. 24.”
IA isnt neutered - this is what happens when people start adding words to stuff they already dont understand.
Congress cant remove the IA but they can request the POTUS to notify them when he is going to use it. And that is what the bill is about.
I guess they hope to skip the country to go into the hiding in that time window, good luck!
That was still part of the quote. But think of when they stop trading in the stock market because
stock sell-offs are dominating and no one is buying stocks. Trading is halted for a time period.
***********************
My mistake...sorry.
Basically, there is no way to explain away the steal.
ThankQ for that info!!
EasySt wrote:
“Notable” from over there...
~~~~
UPDATE: The Friday Night Oval Office Meeting Was EVEN MORE
EXPLOSIVE Than We Thought – GENERAL FLYNN Saved the Day!
Overstock founder Patrick Byrne went on UndercoverDC on Monday to
further discuss the explosive meeting at the White House on Friday night.
During the interview Patrick Byrne described how General Michael Flynn
took control and confronted the naysayers on President Trump’s advisory
team.
According to Patrick Byrne, “General Flynn stood on his feet [in a calm,
measured and professional manner] and gentlemanly asked “Do you think
the President won? Can you say that you think the President won?”the
question … not a single one would answer the question”.
Byrne further states that he told President Trump that “within 30 minutes”
he could produce 3 people who could confirm that his own leadership has
been trying to convince others to get him to concede.
General Flynn was the man of the hour.
This was a pivotal moment in American history.
Democrats must not get away with stealing the largest landslide of a sitting
president in US history.
This cannot stand!
~~~~~~~~~
And...
~~~~~~~~~
“Evidence Grows: ’20 Election Was Rigged”
https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/11/election-2020-was-rigged-the-evidence/
https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2020/07/20/house-section/article/H3114-2
Oh yeah
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.