The Arizona results clearly show that the initial counts were seeded ... in Michigan Edward Solomon showed that the initial counts were determined to be 10th degree polynomials (a statistical impossibility)
In very simple terms, we know that polling is done with statistical sampling - the very idea that you poll across a wide demographic and you only need a very small percentage of these voters to predict the whole.
The mail-in votes for each of these counties were sent to a common location and “pooled”. In other words, all the votes were mixed together from all parts of the county and they did not start counting until after they were all received (Arizona did not allow any ballots after Nov 3). How in the world could you possibly have one batch counted that exceeded the norm by a 10-20% margin? It can ONLY be explained by fraud or purposefully counting democrat submissions - which was said not to have happened.
Any 5th grader could understand the level of fraud here.