Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

“We already had guinea pigs. They all survived.”

What will be the side effects, long-term, of these guinea pigs? Also, there hasn’t been enough time to know how babies of pregnant women can be affected by Mom getting the vaccine.

Of course, testing wasn’t adequate. But I’m all for “my body, my choice”, so if people choose to do it, then fine.

Mom is 96 — in the vulnerable demographic — and said she won’t take it.


55 posted on 12/17/2020 4:04:02 AM PST by MayflowerMadam ("Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free" Galatians 5:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: MayflowerMadam

WyFlu has claimed another casualty: the Medical Industrial Complex.

Trust is the coin of the realm, and Big Med lost ours when it got in bed with Deep State.


64 posted on 12/17/2020 4:20:44 AM PST by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: MayflowerMadam
"What will be the side effects, long-term, of these guinea pigs?"

There's no evidence to support that there will be any long term problems, particularly since all the components of these vaccines break down quickly. That's why they require advanced refrigeration: they fall apart. mRNA is effective as a short term messenger. Nature built DNA for long term stability; mRNA breaks down quickly. And how long as we to sit idly by and wait to see whether some incredibly small risk of long term effects appear? 5 years? 10 years? How many years or decades of Democrats shutting down the economy can people endure? The damage that's already been done just this year will ripple through a generation or more. Poverty kills many people. Vaccines very rarely cause anyone any real harm.

"there hasn’t been enough time to know how babies of pregnant women can be affected by Mom getting the vaccine."

These vaccines - like all new drugs and vaccines - are not currently recommended for women who are pregnant. This is precisely BECAUSE it would be unethical to knowingly test them on pregnant women. Data emerges over time as women who take the vaccine discover they were pregnant at the time they took it and safety data is gleaned from that. It's the only ethical way to do it.

"I’m all for “my body, my choice”, so if people choose to do it, then fine."

I agree with you here. I want people to have all the facts and not be subject to misinformation or fearmongering, but if they then decide the vaccine isn't for them, I 100% support their right to make that decision for themselves. Part of being a free people is having the right to make poor decisions. I may not agree with the decision made, but it's yours to make.

"Mom is 96 — in the vulnerable demographic — and said she won’t take it."

And I fully support her right to make that call. Each and every individual should have their right to decide what is best for their own health and wellbeing respected by all.

74 posted on 12/17/2020 4:29:23 AM PST by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson