250 years after it sunk.
Yes, that's the first line of the article, and I read and understood it.
Am I to assume that these loose timbers washed ashore only now, after 250 years? From the rest of the article, one could easily get the impression that the wreck was discovered decades ago, and that scientists have been puzzled by it ever since, until now.
THAT'S what I meant by "poor journalism."
Regards,