[ransomnote]

ransomnote~

Mardie posted:
https://americanlookout.com/republican-official-claims-chief-justice-roberts-nixed-texas-election-lawsuit-over-fear-of-riots-video/

Republican Official Claims Chief Justice Roberts Nixed Texas Election Lawsuit Over Fear Of Riots

FTA:
It was written by someone who was a current staffer for one of the current Supreme Court justices. ...

Because the charge of the Supreme Court is to ultimately be our final arbitrator, our final line of defense for right and wrong, and they did not do their duty.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Wonder if this is true.

If true, maybe it’s easier to find the innocent in DC because there so few of them and they stand out in a crowd?

It’s as if the earlier strategies of President Trump uncovered layers 1 through 10 of the swamp and the election is uncovering deeper layers, sellouts that would never have been detected if not for this election.

[Snowybear]

> Republican Official Claims Chief Justice Roberts Nixed Texas Election Lawsuit Over Fear Of Riots

Long knives are out for Roberts now.

-SB

[ransomnote]

ransomnote2.0~

Mardie posted:
https://americanlookout.com/republican-official-claims-chief-justice-roberts-nixed-texas-election-lawsuit-over-fear-of-riots-video/

Republican Official Claims Chief Justice Roberts Nixed Texas Election Lawsuit Over Fear Of Riots

FTA:
It was written by someone who was a current staffer for one of the current Supreme Court justices. ...

Because the charge of the Supreme Court is to ultimately be our final arbitrator, our final line of defense for right and wrong, and they did not do their duty.
~~~~~~~~~~~

So I have been thinking about this a little more.

It seems like Roberts is controlled but this reason assigned to him by an anonymous source seems a bit silly for him. It's not like I socialize with SC justices, but I would expect something less simplistic.

Wonder if this is cover for Roberts. Better he be seen as being fearful of people getting hurt than being seen actually subverting the rule of law?

[Ymani Cricket]

Did anyone catch this? It is now 2 days old...I will just post the first paragraph. Go to link for full.

Message to the Congress on the Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Serious Human Rights Abuse and Corruption

TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES: Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, within 90 days before the anniversary date of its declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. In accordance with this provision, I have sent to theFederal Register for publication the enclosed notice stating that the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13818 of December 20, 2017, is to continue in effect beyond December 20, 2020.