Taking control of the US government outside of a process supported by law or the US Constitution would be unlawful. Doing it because “I won and I have strong evidence of it” would be morally supportable, but unlawful. It would forever tarnish a presidency that was maintained through that kind of process. Given the threat from the CCP and foreign and domestic globalists that support the overthrow of the US Government, I would support that move as a last resort rather than submit to a takeover by China, but it would create an entirely new situation in the United States of America. All efforts should be made to do it through the courts and Congress, and Congress’ vote that is the final say under the Constitution is January 6. The Supreme Court is not likely to overturn that vote. The person who receives a majority in that vote is the President-elect.
Mitch has already indicated that he is going to go along with the steal. Actions must be taken between now and then to convince him that he needs to change his mind about that. The people need to be informed, too.
Mitch has already indicated that he is going to go along with the steal.
He’s not “going to go along” with anything. He’s an active participant.
“Actions must be taken between now and then to convince him that he needs to change his mind about that.”
I wonder if he has any exercise equipment?
So there is no way to "legally" say FU to a vote fraud coup if enough bad actors in high places say it's okay? If that is the case, the law is worthless, and it all needs to burn down to the ground.
And yes, I realize what that implies, but they were going to take it anyway.