************************************************************
I understand why they did it, but isn't that a fine way to stand behind YOUR PRESIDENT after taking crap for 4 years to make this a better Country and get the rotten filth out of our government: RAT ROMNEY; PELOUSY; SCHUMER and all the RINOS and rotten, stinking, lying, thieving DEMOCRATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank You drdirt for the backbone to say it!!!!!!!!!!!!
What’s needed is a campaign or rally or set of weekly rallys to publically shame the three Trump appointees to the court, who had and still have the opportunity, the ability and THEIR SWORN DUTY to uphold and defend the Constitution.
************************************************************
I understand why they did it, but isn’t that a fine way to stand behind YOUR PRESIDENT after taking crap for 4 years to make this a better Country and get the rotten filth out of our government: RAT ROMNEY; PELOUSY; SCHUMER and all the RINOS and rotten, stinking, lying, thieving DEMOCRATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank You drdirt for the backbone to say it!!!!!!!!!!!!
————————————-
I believe they did uphold the constitution. The denial was not on merit, it was on standing. A constitutionalist will do this whereas a political shill will not.
I’m thinking it took backbone to deny Texas as it was presented...and it will take backbone to constitutionally judge all of the other lawsuits before them.
Remember. Texas is retooling this lawsuit.