To: Organic Panic
Why. They didn’t crap on the franchise enough with number 4?
—
Maybe it’s like the old original Star Trek movies where every other one was good.
Raiders of the Lost Ark - good
Temple of Doom - bad
Last Crusade - good
Crystal Skull - bad
To: Flick Lives
Maybe it’s like the old original Star Trek movies where every other one was good.
Raiders of the Lost Ark - good
Temple of Doom - bad
Last Crusade - good
Crystal Skull - bad
Bah. I liked Temple of Doom better than the Last Crusade, even accounting for the awesomeness of Sean Connery's presence.
73 posted on
12/11/2020 9:51:18 PM PST by
fr_freak
To: Flick Lives
Maybe it’s like the old original Star Trek movies where every other one was good.
————————————
Star Trek:TMP actually was good. STIII: TSFS was ok as well.
STV blew. ST:VII was ok ST:IX blew. ST:X blew
90 posted on
12/12/2020 12:37:04 AM PST by
Starcitizen
(Thank you to the Senate for passing S.386, turning the US into the third-world shithole of India. )
To: Flick Lives
Last Crusade gets a “good” tag only because Crystal Skull was so bad. Everyone was hoping #4 would bring back the magic of #1.
110 posted on
12/12/2020 7:23:38 AM PST by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson