[Michael.SF.]

Your comment makes sense and parallels my understanding of the concept.

But, in this case Texas has been impacted directly, as the man they voted for was denied his office because four states conducted an election using illegal actions.

[LouieFisk]

“But, in this case Texas has been impacted directly, as the man they voted for was denied his office because four states conducted an election using illegal actions.”
—
I think there might be a catch-22 in there, though. The court would have to find the actions as illegal first before granting standing.