Thank you. I am really wondering about the reasoning of Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.
Same here. Obviously the outcome of one state’s presidential election effects all other states. If certain states choose their electors through an unconstitutional process that could (and in this case did) change the outcome from what it otherwise would have been, and in doing so force a fraudulent President onto the rest of the country, it seems to me the question of standing should be cut and dry.
I’m wondering if they just got caught up in their own legalese or if they’ve been compromised.