Posted on 12/11/2020, 3:37:10 PM by jroehl
Edited on 12/11/2020, 3:41:42 PM by Admin Moderator. [history]
Fox news:
155, ORIG. TEXAS V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL. The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot. Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.
~~~~~~~~
The grounds for martial law seem to be in place. The courts are unable to function as designed by the framers of our constitution.
Hope Trump is “on the move” The Rats have stolen the election and even Trumps own justices won’t hear the case. They could have pretended to have an interest.
DJT has nothing left but Martial Law. Might as well go with it. We are totally doomed unless Trump makes something happen. Rats are laughing their way to the bank. No Rep will win again. No one will back Trump in 2024. That is useless.
Wow. In my whole life, I never would have looked forward to martial law to make me feel safe. What a long strange trip it’s been....
I heard one legal brain say that the case was declined on the basis of standing and therefore the plaintiffs can go back to the district court and file on different grounds. The problem with that - it seems to me - is time!