[Steven W.]

I don’t know about that (I’m a software / tech guy in professional life lol) but my take was:

1) I think the premise of the Texas lawsuit being that the defendant states violated their own laws, statues and state constitution(s) during the election is solid ground and what was affirmed 9-0 in 2000 Bush v. Gore ... it was always my thinking that any successful contest of the election at the SCOTUS level might (should!) incorporate such arguments.

2) I think that Texas did have standing and that the SCOTUS was obligated to at least hear the case arising from original jurisdiction ... but as long as Cuck Roberts is there nothing is going to happen.

3) When I first heard about this “re-tooling TX style lawsuit” I thought what was being referred to was in regards to the violation of state laws + constitutions, etc., but what Rudy is alluding to is the issue of standing, which, albeit on front end or back side (laches) all these state courts + federal judges have been dismissing under (though wrong IMO an easy + quick way out)

I think what’s being referred to now is actually a combination of these things - being that the road to the SCOTUS requires demonstrating that the subject states are violating their own laws, statutes & constitution(s) and that the challenger has indisputable standing. NOTE in the TX case they were able to avoid this consideration by first dismissing TX as having no standing and then all the rest (including Trump’s) as being “moot”.

I’ve watched these hearings + actions etc. and see there has been a strategic alignment of actions toward this objective. The Sidney Powell & Lin Wood + Sean (PA Congressman) actions have merit but they are being dealt with as sideshows by the Court(s).

I’ve also believed that if you can get to a point where + when the SCOTUS actually has to hear something, then the burden for Cuck Roberts to push the other way to maintain whatever integrity is left in the Court(s) shifts ... i.e. but it depends on the merits of the case(s).

NOW as for the 2% posts above, the role of Dominion + Scytl & Clarity in these things continues to intrigue me and my own professional career including specific experience in that exact space, even directly competing with Scytl now some years back, is that there is clearly an appearance that things were rigged internally. HOWEVER we need to see the insides and proof and those things are only really going to come from the “sting” aspects of these things. Either POTUS + “Q” and the white hats indeed have it all or they don’t ... if they do, and that’s my perpetually reinforced belief + assumption, then these things are going to explode on the battlefield & nothing can stop what’s coming ... nothing!

TBD + WWG1WGA :)

[Steven W.]

WIS Federal Judge dismisses Trump case with prejudice

https://mobile.twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1337857808574935041

[Miss Didi]

Thank you for your wonderful response!

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Nice Steven! Thanks.

[Steve Van Doorn]

Good post. Though we don't need the courts at all to contests this election. Remember DHS and office of DNI(coming) reports will show Biden/Harris is a national security threat. Once that is established officially it's done.

You know what is most interesting to me. How the color revolution wins is when the people give up on the system. Pelosi views those most positive of the system as her biggest threat (Q people)

[little jeremiah]

Couple thoughts about the SCOTUS decision:

LittleLinda:

Did we ever find out why PDJT and/or his team met with the USSC last week? I know there was some discussion about ex parte communications.

Maybe he gave them proof that there was interference by a foreign state and provided a copy of his EO covering this exact situation. I don’t remember the timing of that meeting versus the lawsuit events timeline, but this could explain why the Court asked for defensive briefs and then killed the suit a day or two later. They were inclined to consider the case until they learned about the foreign interference.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

@RedRock1T
Replying to
@CodeMonkeyZ

Texas doesn’t have standing because the fraud was in collusion with foreign states making the fraudsters enemy combatants...

and therefore classifed and under military law not constitutional law.

see executive order on election interference.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

My thoughts yesterday fwiw:

A thought just occurred to me about this SCOTUS ruling and applying gnerally.

For years, and I heard AG Barr give a speech about this quite some time ago, the judiciary has become MUCH too powerful. Instead of legislative action, people turn to courts, and judges have become bloated and power mad (my words, not Barr’s). The judiciary needs to resume their proper position in the balance of power between the three branches.

So maybe in the ultimate issue this ruling will actually help to pave the way for a less bloatedly powerful judiciary.