Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve Van Doorn

Scotus denied based on standing not merit. Scotus is saying that they are not willing to agree that Texas has a right to another states compliance with their own laws. Scotus didn’t deny that any of the claims in the case were in dispute. The case simply needs to come back via a proper litigant.


1,620 posted on 12/12/2020 6:43:56 AM PST by Professional ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1462 | View Replies ]


To: Professional; grey

Professional wrote:

“Scotus denied based on standing not merit. Scotus is saying that they are not willing to agree that Texas has a right to another states compliance with their own laws. Scotus didn’t deny that any of the claims in the case were in dispute. The case simply needs to come back via a proper litigant.”

Good point!!


2,014 posted on 12/12/2020 3:39:54 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 retusrning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1620 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson