grey_whiskers wrote:
“
“SCOTUS took the case that would change the election results”
...PA alone wouldn’t do it.”
About that single PA case:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3913519/posts?page=18#18
“
“So I guess That’s that..right?”
No, despite what the MSM may want you to believe.
The PA case is still under consideration, just no immediate injunction.
The Texas case (much stronger) was taken up by the Supreme Court, and the state of Louisiana joined the case on the side of Texas, of course.
Lin Wood was also able to file his appeal with the Supreme Court today too.
Actually, this is the best day we’ve had yet.”
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
IMPORTANT POINT REPORTERS ARE MISSING IN PA SUIT:
The Supreme Court only denied emergency injunctive relief. In the order, it did NOT deny cert.
@MikeKelly PA’s suit is still pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.
https://supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?fi
“SCOTUS took the case that would change the election results”
Okay - we get to SCOTUS. They’re, at best, going to rule that, yes the elections were unconstitutional, and they’ll refer it back to the state legislatures to appoint the electors.
Is there any chance in heck that there are enough balls in any of the legislatures to go against their states’ “popular vote” and do the right thing? Didn’t we already see this problem pop up in the PA legislature where they wouldn’t throw out the election and take over on their own after being shown the fraud and corruption by Rudy’s team?