"Why does he say that! He means when they review the record of fraud in the lower courts! You can't introduce evidence in the Supreme Court!"
And damn if every lower court so far has refused to let that evidence be heard.
Well, I'm not saying Thomas knew it, but... >— Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) December 9, 2020
I'm just saying: There IS a time when the Supreme Court can consider evidence in the first instance: When it hears a case in which it has original, not appellate, jurisdiction.
There's pretty much one kind of case like that.
And that's the case I woke up to this morning. 🌞 <>— Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) December 9, 2020
BookmarQed!