Yes, he did that. Since the audited count still verified the outcome of the original count, he stuck with the original count. I think the originally uncounted votes in Floyd County and the ballots found somewhere else were added in, but in Counties where there was just a difference, the question arises "which count to report?". It really doesn't make a hill of beans difference in the end. The machines were shown to have reported correctly, and one could argue they were more accurate than human counting.
The bottom line is that two disparate systems for counting the votes were used and the same outcome resulted.
How was Risk-Limiting Audit Full Hand Count conducted? I don’t believe it was full hand counting. Did they still use a machine to count?
Oops, wrong again. Here is a recorded call with an election official saying she was told by then state to report the original numbers even though the recount differed.
https://twitter.com/jennybethm/status/1329615123133067264?s=21
Interestingly, EVERY election official that did report different numbers got sacked.
Your buddies are up to no good.
I’m amazed you are still on FR defending them and Dominion.
He did not audit, it was RISK LIMITING AUDIT. For those who don’t know what that is, basically it is feeding a small sample size through a machine and saying, ok the machines are good!
It shows nothing. Any machine can be chosen and because the changes can be done through a backdoor or flash drive, it proves nothing.
A forensic audit will tell, as will confiscated flash drives.