Thanks for clarification.
There is a lot of conflicting information on the interwebs.
If SCOTUS does not take Texas case, then they won't be getting involved in the election period. The Texas case is the cleanest case for them to get involved and order relief.— Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) December 8, 2020
What I find with a legal synopsis from Barnes of seemingly complex litigation is his simplicity. This particular new lawsuit from Texas is a Bush v Gore on steroids MOAB, as it becomes paired down presents a simple yes no matter of law for SCOTUS to decide.— debtanchor (@debtanchor1) December 8, 2020
People tend to forget the Constitution is really just a contract between states, where the states contractually agreed how they would pick a President, where they could sue if a dispute arises between them, and even the remedy if contested electors denies any candidate a majority https://t.co/oeohmYf0w0— Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) December 8, 2020
weston, if the courts and Congress fail the American people, there is still one more avenue to fix things.
And it involves the military directly.
Many enemies, foreign and domestic, that co-ordinated on this fraudulent election.
And the President has the proof.
He has the duty under his oath of office to protect the country from all enemies, foreign and domestic.
And he will carry it out.