Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NIKK

Bwahahahahaha, Jim.

(Although....not exactly thrilled w/the KellyAnne appointment....after her PREMATURE I'll work w/Bidet comment.)

760 posted on 12/08/2020 12:36:28 PM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 759 | View Replies ]


To: Jane Long

ANOTHER BOOM!

Supreme Court Formally Dockets Texas Election Case Against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania And Wisconsin

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3913477/posts


761 posted on 12/08/2020 12:42:18 PM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. (Psalm 33:12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies ]

To: Jane Long; hoosiermama; exit82; Lakeside Granny

Carrie Sheffield

BREAKING: Trump campaign says it will fight on, that “safe harbor” deadline is not end game today; only January 20 date fixed in Constitution. Meanwhile Texas AG suing to block returns in 4 states.

In a novel legal strike, the state of Texas has asked the Supreme Court to invalidate the election results in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia, arguing officials in those four battleground states violated the Constitution by making changes to how ballots were cast and counted without legislative approval.

The lawsuit filed late Monday night by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton asked the justices to issue a temporary restraining order preventing the states "from taking action to certify presidential electors or to have such electors take any official action including without limitation participating in the electoral college."

The suit argues that changes made by the state's governors, secretaries of states and election supervisors were "inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution."

States are allowed in certain circumstances to appeal directly to the Supreme Court, bypassing lower federal courts, in disputes involving other states. Paxton argued the state of Texas was wrongly harmed by the unconstitutional acts of the other states.

"These non-legislative changes ... facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution," the suit stated. "By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution."

FULL..LAWSUIT IN THE ARTICLE.


763 posted on 12/08/2020 12:47:08 PM PST by STARLIT (“WE CAN'T DIRECT THE WIND BUT WE CAN ADJUST OUR SAILS" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson