To: LS; Jane Long
CONGRATS LS! I will also say you stepped up on election night with your excellent show. All the BEST to you.
704 posted on
12/08/2020 10:32:08 AM PST by
STARLIT
(“WE CAN'T DIRECT THE WIND BUT WE CAN ADJUST OUR SAILS" )
To: Jane Long; Spirit of Liberty; djstex; lysie; MS.BEHAVIN
Mark Levin
The Pennsylvania case before the Supreme Court is solid and important. No one knows how the court will handle the case, but it remains extremely important nonetheless. Then, the plenary power of states must be defined so that its limits are clear otherwise a lawful election process will remain unknown. Plenary power does not mean a state can violate its own state constitution in order to influence or affect an election. This case is not about disenfranchising 2.4 million mail-in voters, it's about disenfranchising the more than 4 million other PA voters and more than 70 million other American voters who are negatively impacted by the decisions of the state in this case. Also, if this PA case arrives in Congress they will sort it out because they have a job to do, just like the US Supreme Court has a job to do too. Beyond chiming in on the next cultural case where they can stifle religious liberty. Ultimately, the mob will not rule.
705 posted on
12/08/2020 10:33:39 AM PST by
STARLIT
(“WE CAN'T DIRECT THE WIND BUT WE CAN ADJUST OUR SAILS" )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson