Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Spunky

Sort of like racing.
Speed costs money...how fast do you want to go?


5,535 posted on 12/19/2020 1:48:27 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5534 | View Replies ]


To: nascarnation; Spunky

Exactly. Only the extremely wealthy could afford to fly on it.


5,537 posted on 12/19/2020 1:50:56 PM PST by hoosiermama ( When you open your heart to patriotism, there is not room for prejudice. .DJT )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5535 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation; djstex; MS.BEHAVIN; cyn; Stars-stripes; Vlad The Inhaler

Mαχιмυs Fire Uηceηѕoяed
**************
FWIW The VP Role (addendum to “Constitutional Plan” pinned thread):
***************
-The VP is Constitutionally empowered to “count” electoral votes.
****************
-Under 12A, he alone counts the ballots and is the arbiter of disputes. Congress, largely, is just in an observational role.
***************

FWIW VP 2
***************
-For much of our history, especially during Election 1876, the VP exercised this power.
****************
-Confusion begins over the Electoral Count Act of 1887, passed after the chaos of Election 1886.
*****************
-This act seeks to restrain the VP’s role by inserting provisions for objections.
*****************
FWIW VP 3
**************
-However, it is unconstitutional because it 1) seeks to reduce the Constitutional power vested in the VP and 2) forces Congress to accept the “executive” (governor’s) slates of electors if a dispute cannot be settled. Both statutes violate Article 2.
******************
FWIW VP 4
******************
-In 1887, Republicans maintained the Act was unconstitutional. Since then, scholarship has supported this.
******************
-The VP also has the power to “preserve order”, the extent of which can be considerable as he oversees the Joint-Session of Congress, not the House Speaker.
******************
FWIW VP 5
******************
-If the VP wished to, he could claim a degree of constitutional authority and refuse to count a slate from contested states (See Hawaii 1960).
*****************
-As a law professor said, “doing so would go against the grain of both the Electoral Count Act and historical practice.”
**************
FWIW VP 6
*****************
-But recent (post-1887) “historical practice” is not Constitutional law.
****************
-And what could members of Congress do? Run to SCOTUS? Good luck with that.
****************
-——TERMS of the LAW-——
https://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2719&context=luclj#page=19

But every Republican in the Senate is corrupt.
****************
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Jordan Zaputil
@JordanZaputil23
·
Dec 15
No they have to vote party line
Sam
@redtetrahedron
·
Dec 15
Replying to
@Maximus_4EVR
The question is, will he have the guts?
California Patriot
@RobertC61708697
·
Dec 15
That is, indeed, the question
*****************
Patrik Herman

Do you think McConell is just pretending to throw Trump over board or not?
**************
He voted against officially recognizing Biden as president elect, that’s worth more than anything he could say.
*****************
Andrew Boyd
**
Probably part of optics.
************

Chris Podurgiel
**
Thank you for posting this!! This has answered my questions (and confirmed my suspicions) as to this “scenario”.


5,759 posted on 12/20/2020 12:13:29 PM PST by STARLIT (“WE CAN'T DIRECT THE WIND BUT WE CAN ADJUST OUR SAILS" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5535 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson