Are you watching? The judge’s opening statements already tells me that he may be planning to dismiss on procedural grounds.
- he said they lack standing
(they are electors!?)
- should be filed in state court
- plantiff’s waited too long
(could not file until certified ... And they filed a few days after)
- cannot ask for injunctive relief
Each side has 30 minutes
Defendants are arguing now, bringing up other court cases like this which has been dismissed.
Basically he’s saying “no standing”.
Saying that they should have challenged Raffensperger in March 2020
(This deal was done in secret, even legislators did not know until elections started in Nov)
An O sending up to higher court on appeal. It’s to be expected.
Defendants arguing that all arguments against Dominion machines last year shot down.
(Doesn’t mean they were wrong)
Saying legislature could have change code on absentee ballots
Says Gringberg already shot down the lawsuit by Wood regarding Secretary of State illegal deal with dems
Arguing now that the machines printed ballots and people could look at them. Machines are not unconstitutional.
Done, saving rest of time for rebuttal
If this prevails, all the moaning about what do we tell our children about bullying (never mind that we never worried about what to tell our children when Obama gave people ‘the finger’ while they were talking to him) should now turn in to what do we tell our children about stealing? #StealingIsAOK?