Don’t doubt your figures a bit. Who was doing the adjustment? Did they leave a “paper trail”?
That’s what was reported in the official data that was being
analyzed. The mathematician was explaining the proof of
fraud in the data from the patterns he found.
No paper trail necessary, the algorithm was consistently
keeping the third party candidate around 2% and taking
votes from the other candidates in differing proportions and
that’s reflected in the publicly available data.
He states at the end that it may have been giving them votes
to Biden, to which that will be where either there is the
back-filling of ballots and/or the paper ballot count would
be off. Supporting mathematical proof and physical evidence
will be there as they put it all together.