From who? There are a number of details revealed by Q that have yet to be reported outside of the Q community involving thing ranging from the true nature of the Kim dynasty and Trump’s relationship to Kim personally to insights into the 2017 Vegas shooting. Read through some of those early posts.
Here’s the thing. If I were a skeptic about Q,
the first question I would ask is “what proof is there that Q is what he says he is?
If somebody pointed to predictions Q made that ended up coming true, I would point to the predictions made that didn’t come true.
But then they might point out to me that just because not all of Q’s predictions came true, it doesn’t mean Q is not legit. In fact, with the need for disinformation, not having a perfect track record on predictions is totally consistent with Q being legit.
I would then probably say “Why should I assume a prediction rate less than 100% is the result of deliberate disinformation from someone with inside knowledge rather than just the failed predictions of a LARP with no inside information?
They would then point you to the Q-proofs of which there are many. These are not predictions made by Q, but rather posts that make it clear that Q is someone close to the President.
Well that certainly would be what the q hierarchy would want you to believe especially if you're convinced he works in the Trump administration or/and close ties with someone who does.