[whitney69]

“Those six States were just the main ones in the media (well, OAN) that look to have a decent chance of being corrected.”

But you don’t consider a win based upon the correction of a couple of states. If there is a question about voting integrity, then everyone should play. Biden may have lost some in other states the he won based upon graft. And Trump may have won some the same way. But we can’t let anyone get away with it and to do that will constitute a nation wide recount the way I mentioned....with both sides in the loop. I have no desire to not have integrity enough to forget the states either won or how many votes they actually got that will lead, hopefully, to the people that handled the cheat. If you re cleaning up the mess, the little guy is collateral damage, I want the big guys. And escape is easier if the law only looks in a few states.

Two states, Nebraska and Maine, do not follow this winner-take-all method. In those states, electoral votes are proportionally allocated. Maine and Nebraska employ a “district system” in which two at-large electors vote for the state’s popular plurality and one elector votes for each congressional district’s popular plurality.

In Nebraska this year Biden got one electoral vote even though he didn’t get 40% of the vote. In Maine, Biden got 3 of the 4 them even though Trump got 44.2% of the vote. A little standardization, please. So how many states did Biden win that he didn’t which put together a total of more electoral college votes than the ones being investigated? To hit a home run, you have to circle all the bases in the proper order.

If the cheating is wide spread, which I feel it is, all those little numbers add up and subtract from totals. Demand a recount of them all and the territories then they can determine what happened....and hopefully who.

wy69

[Svartalfiar]

But you don’t consider a win based upon the correction of a couple of states. If there is a question about voting integrity, then everyone should play.

True, but the rest of the States (possibly) didn't have as much fraud, and were not expected to be a win for Trump. Yes, everywhere needs to be looked at with a fine-tooth comb, but to get the ball rolling, you need to have other States that are easier to find the fraud in. Once a couple States nullify or reverse their elections, there won't be any way for anyone to argue that every single other State shouldn't be looked at. A couple States get us the Trump win. And that is what gets us the big win: fixing the election process to be much more secured and honest.


Two states, Nebraska and Maine, do not follow this winner-take-all method. In those states, electoral votes are proportionally allocated.
...
A little standardization, please.

Actually, I think this is a good idea, and better reflects the will of the country as a whole, and not just the most populous areas. While the EC does a decent job of forcing nominees to do some campaigning outside of NY, TX, and CA, forcing them to win on a district level would be much more of a challenge. Especially for the Democrats, as most of the country by area is conservative. It just has to be done all at once, because if the Repub States do it on their own, that'll allow the winner-take-all Dems to stay as they are, and take the win.