Replies

Staying with the plant theme, and dual meanings, I heard RG wrote that he couldn’t find Sleepy’s palm reference in the old or new testament.

https://twitter.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1332083429236744192
I am unable to find the Book of Palms in either the Old or New Testament? Could Biden have had his own independent revelation?

___________________________________________________________

Sleepy-”And if we do, and I’m sure we can, we can proclaim, the Palmist, the Palmist who wrote these following words, The Lord is my strength and shield.”

___________________________________________________________

I am a little confused which Lord is being referred to.

Lord can mean- guardian of the loaf, beezlebub, landlord-owner of land.

Maybe before a LID is called, someone can get an ASK for clarification of which Lord is being referred to before things get catawampus, catty-cornered or I turn into a Catamount.
___________________________________________________________

lord (n.)

mid-13c., laverd, loverd, from Old English hlaford “master of a household, ruler, feudal lord, superior; husband,” also “God,” translating Latin dominus, Greek kyrios in the New Testament, Hebrew yahweh in the Old (though Old English dryhten was more frequent). Old English hlaford is a contraction of earlier hlafweard, literally “one who guards the loaves,” from hlaf “bread, loaf” (see loaf (n.)) + weard “keeper, guardian” (from PIE root *wer- (3) “perceive, watch out for”).

Compare lady (literally “bread-kneader”), and Old English hlafæta “household servant,” literally “loaf-eater.” For the contraction, compare Harold. The modern monosyllabic form emerged 14c. Meaning “an owner of land, houses, etc.,” is from c. 1300; the sense in landlord. As the “usual polite or respectful form of address to a nobleman under the rank of a duke, and to a bishop” [OED] from 1540s. As an interjection from late 14c. Lords “peers of England,” especially as represented in parliaments, is from mid-15c.

Lord’s Prayer is from 1540s. Year of our Lord is from late 14c. (translating Latin anno domini) in reference to the incarnation of God in Christ. Lord knows (who, what, why, etc.), expressing a state of ignorance, is from 1711. Lord of the Flies (1907) translates Beelzebub (q.v.); William Golding’s book was published in 1954. To drink like a lord is from 1620s.

___________________________________________________________

I found some early references of palm, speaking of it apparently in another tongue.

___________________________________________________________

etymology
excerpts

palm (n.1)

“flat of the hand, inner surface of the hand between the wrist and the fingers,” c. 1300, paume, from Old French paume, palme (Modern French paume), from Latin palma “palm of the hand,”

___________________________________________________________

Palm oil is earlier in the punning sense of “bribe” (1620s)

___________________________________________________________

Palm court “large room in a hotel, etc., usually decorated with potted palms” is recorded by 1908.

___________________________________________________________

palm (v.)

“impose (something) on (someone) by fraud,” 1670s, from palm (n.1); around the same time it also meant “conceal in the palm of the hand” (1670s) and “handle, manipulate” (1680s). Extended form palm off (something, on someone) is from 1822.

___________________________________________________________

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3910046/posts

“Trump Now Says Biden Will Have To ‘Prove’ His 80 Million Votes Weren’t Fraudulent Before Giving Up White House
USSA News ^ | 11/27/2020 | Tyler Durden
Posted on 11/27/2020, 10:27:11 AM by SeekAndFind

In a sharp reversal of earlier comments to reporters, President Trump on Friday said that he’ll only leave the White House if Biden can prove the election wasn’t fraudulent.

“Biden can only enter the White House as President if he can prove that his ridiculous “80,000,000 votes” were not fraudulently or illegally obtained,” tweeted Trump, adding “When you see what happened in Detroit, Atlanta, Philadelphia & Milwaukee, massive voter fraud, he’s got a big unsolvable problem!”

Biden can only enter the White House as President if he can prove that his ridiculous “80,000,000 votes” were not fraudulently or illegally obtained. When you see what happened in Detroit, Atlanta, Philadelphia & Milwaukee, massive voter fraud, he’s got a big unsolvable problem! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2020

* * *

President Trump took questions from reporters on Thursday evening for the first time since Election Day. And after confirming a few days ago via Twitter that he would tell the GSA to formally begin the transition process, the president confirmed to a group of MSM journalists that he would formally surrender power to Biden should Trump’s rival win the Electoral College vote.

During the scrum, Trump took about 25 minutes to rehash a series of allegations his legal team has so far made while saying flatly that Biden couldn’t have done as well as he did without “fraud”.

Reporters of course leapt at the opportunity to ask all kinds of salacious questions: Trump was asked if he’d physically leave the White House if the Electoral College affirms Biden’s victory - Trump replied “certainly I will, and you know that.”

After a round of antagonistic questions, Trump started lashing out at various states for dropping the ball and ruining his chances at a second term, while reiterating that this was “a rigged election...at the highest level”.

Trump slammed Georgia’s Republican secretary of state - who penned an op-ed slamming Trump and his supporters - as an “enemy of the people.” He added that he would soon stage a rally in Georgia, where voters return to the polls in early January for a pair of runoff Senate races that will determine control of the Upper Chamber.

Finally, Trump repeatedly returned to questioning Joe Biden’s raw vote total, insisting the Democrat couldn’t have done so well as compared to previous Democratic candidates, although population growth historically drives growth in voting numbers while 2020 led to a particularly charged political atmosphere.

“This is not a candidate that can get 80 million votes,” he said of Biden. “The only way he got 80 million votes is through a massive fraud.”

Trump declined to say if he’d attend Biden’s inauguration, as is the custom for an outgoing president. “I’ll be honest, I know the answer, but I just don’t want to say it yet,” he said, before adding that it’s “not right” that Biden has already started picking his cabinet.

Both Trump and Biden stayed close to home for the Thanksgiving holiday. The inauguration for Biden (assuming he does win the EC) would take place on Jan. 20.”

Interesting post:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3910046/posts?page=54#54

“As an immutable legal principle, any party that engages in a social contract (such as an election) and then cheats to try to unfairly “win” that contract, is disqualified by default. You cannot win an election by stealing it. There is overwhelming legal precedent for this in court decisions from both SCOTUS and Federal district courts. The recounts are irrelevant. The “certification” of the fraudulent votes is just theater. None of that matters once the overwhelming fraudulent nature of the entire operation is documented and revealed to all.”