Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: COBOL2Java
Most of what Biden has up on his website requires legislation. The NFA and 1968 Act are quite clear in their definitions of what's covered. So clear in fact that an AR lower is no longer considered a firearm by some circuit courts, because it doesn't meet the statutory definition.

Good luck trying to get all semi-automatics classified as NFA items.

Similarly with requiring an FFL for any transfer: you have to be in the "business" of selling firearms, which would mean it must be above the "hobby" level as the IRS classifies it.

The biggest direct threat is if they tried to pull an FFL holder's license if he didn't treat an "assault weapon" as an NFA item, but even that I think would be dispensed with in the courts fairly quickly.

19 posted on 11/23/2020 11:36:46 AM PST by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pierrem15

I think the go after dealers and manufacturers with product liability law suits. Basically sue them out of existence. Keep what you got.


22 posted on 11/23/2020 11:47:30 AM PST by Jimmy The Snake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson