Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steven W.
We have contacted the Georgia Secretary of State's Division of Elections to discuss this matter as well as the FBI for assistance in determining the appropriate path moving forward.

It sounds like the culprits did the electoral equivalent of sending child porn shots to a commercial photo developer. Ordinarily one expects privacy to be protected. But when a felony is in the mix, the expectations of privacy go out the window. Suppose they were asked to shred a truckload of Trump ballots.

1,464 posted on 11/24/2020 5:53:54 PM PST by AZLiberty (As of Monday, May 18, at 9:30 am, I'm a U.S. citizen. And I VOTED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1194 | View Replies ]


To: AZLiberty

Could be all kinds of interesting things including comms ... TBD + WWG1WGA :)


1,465 posted on 11/24/2020 5:55:50 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1464 | View Replies ]

To: AZLiberty

If the shredding was real ballots, there will be considerable evidence to prove it. I think we learned 2-3 weeks ago that the ballot paper was specially created and had corn components, not a typical ingredient of paper.

We also read that the ink may have had non-radioactive isotopes. Both the corn and the isotopes will leave signature characteristics even after shredding, so testing will allow the FBI to determine whether or not they used to be ballots. The person who commissioned the shredding will have trouble explaining the presence of those specific ballot components in the shreds.


1,546 posted on 11/24/2020 7:37:25 PM PST by LittleLinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1464 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson