This seems different than Florida. All the filings were taken up. Thank heavens for Sanders Sauls
If no judge takes a case and kicks because of no standing, unlike Florida, how does it ever get to SCOTUS?
And does SCOTUS even take it? If so, do they kick it back to the originating judge to have another look?
We are running out of time.
Michigan I believe is the state that is currently saying their state court will not hear the Trump Campaign Case, until certification.
That sounds close to the point you are making, (re: FL 2000) about legal *standing*, which can then be justified before the court ĺfollowing the state’s election certification.
Sclapp, or Rudy G., I forget, said the Campaign’s case is exclusively against the on-the-ground and tricky ballots case. It is a civil rights case, a constitutional case and is based on the lowest rung of adjudication to a court. It is called, PREPONDERANCE of EVIDENCE.
“PoE” is pretty obvious. Witness Affidavits are considered direct evidence and PoE does not require the greater degree of exacting evidence of a criminal case.
(This is what irks the media. PoE is not something they understood.)
Sydney’s case is one for a Criminal pleading before the court, if I understood Matt & Rudy.
Her case we’ve learned is unconnected to Trump personally or to the Campaign.
If she’s got that Frankfurt heist in her pocket, video of the denying Dominion conspirator saying the algorithms can be adjusted to affect candidate’s numbers, and phone recordings of conspiratorial conversations, sounds like a walk in the park, over to the intersection called, “Case Closed”, right?
What I don’t know, is how and at what point might this Sydney Powell case land in a Gitmo Tribunal Courtroom? Probably not until after individual conspirators are arrested first, named later and already bedded down in CoooBa. (snort)