These graphs prove nothing. Even though highly unlikely, it is remotely possible that a large number of votes were predominantly for one candidate. We need sworn statements by people who witnessed or perpetrated fraud. Affidavits by statisticians are of no value.
Don’t they? They show when the votes came in!
What time did Michigan ‘shut down vote counting’ and send its observers home?
“Since when do they just stop counting votes on election day in America?
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) November 4, 2020”
When did the observers return?
All the votes in between are invalid.
We’ll see about that.
Sworn statements are also of no value without the hard numbers, graphically depicted so that people can grok what the egghead supposed witness is claiming on his word alone.
Have to disagree Calvin.
I expect a normal distribution of votes.
I cannot accept a run of 135,000 consecutive votes for Biden. That’s like flipping a coin 135, 000 and each time it comes up heads.
Never going to happen
You cannot physically get those sorts of numbers into the machines in that short a time period - so yes is obvious fraud.
“Affidavits by statisticians are of no value.” Really?! Then why are they existing in the first place?