Sidney Powell has expanded on the scope of the Dominion scam

Every time Sidney Powell speaks, she drops a little more information, and what she has to say always challenges our illusions about election fairness.

During an interview with Glenn Beck, Sidney Powell offered some fascinating new insights into the claim that Dominion and Smartmatic voting systems have been used to engage in systematic election interference at home and abroad. She also pushed back against media and NeverTrump claims that Trump’s legal team has no evidence to back up these charges. [UPDATE: a stunning 14-minute interview with Howie Carr later in the day added more information, and is embedded below the Glenn Beck interview.]

Of course, the lawyers do not have to give their proof to the media. The media are just as capable of digging up the material. Moreover, no lawyer should ever give the opponent (and that would be, not just the Democrat party and Dominion, but the media as well) the entire case before going into court. That’s an insane tactic.

In the interview, Powell explained some of the problems associated with giving the media a neat little package of evidence to take home with them, pick apart, and attack for Biden’s benefit:

Well, we will start putting documents online and sending them to people like you as soon as we possibly can. I would hope that we could start that by this weekend. I mean we’ve just been taking in information, not just through a fire hose. I mean, it started through a fire hose and then it became a tsunami. And some people, of course, don’t want their names disclosed. They have all kinds of fears. We have people around the country with security now that they’ve never had [it] before just because they dared to tell the truth.

Time for some speculation in light of what is clearly not a case of public opinion but a Constitutional matter for SCOTUS:

What if...just WHAT IF...the Durham investigation turned up evidence of something MUCH bigger than collusion of multiple US agencies in a soft coup, but evidence that the plot extended much, much deeper?

WHAT IF the reason for no charges in Russiagate was for this singular reason, that they had intercepts - electronic or otherwise - which outlined a plot, but the ONLY way to take down a plot to usurp the US Constitution was to give them more rope?

WHAT IF now the ‘evidence’ Powell et al refuse to disclose publicly is so explosive that the ONLY mechanism to prevent a descent into anarchy by a rogue US government is to follow the Constitution and let SCOTUS review the plot & evidence...all of which is largely over the heads of any lower courts?

That which results from a ruling pro-Trump on matters which will ultimately be made public explains Trump’s actions election night - the SCIF - and post-election. It also explains the lack of action on clearly criminal actions by FBI and DOJ personnel, to state nothing of the ‘collusion’ (direction) of 0bama administration staff/appointees and...0bama himself.

I do not fear riotous leftist idiots and their destructive temper tantrums (there WILL be equalizers)...

I fear a magnification of the state-level anarchy under ‘health concerns’ by powerful federal government agencies poised to both foment chaos/violence (false flag?) and remain in control in the wake of the greatest Constitutional crisis in US history.

If faith in elections is not restored (it is currently poised to be completely destroyed upon reveal of all of the evidence), my ‘ballot’ is dutifully obligated to be FMJ.

So, too, is it of ALL those who took an oath.

In spite of my initial shock and anger at Powell’s rebuffing of Tucker Carlson, I believe in the process and view all those who call for Trump to ‘concede’ as domestic enemies (’we’ have a list, too. Don’t ‘we’??).

I find it all-too-coincidental that ‘lockdowns’ are spreading state-by-state (to include curfews) as we approach a Constitutional tipping point.

No one is ‘ready’ for civil war (well, most people, anyway). Certainly not I.

However, I’m ready to make a decision, as the consequence of indecisiveness and acquiescence - collectively - is fait accompli.

I expect a normal distribution of votes.

In statistics (which I have slightly more than a nodding acquaintance with) ”normal distribution” refers to the famous “Bell Curve.” It is so named because it is normal for random processes to fit that curve, since that curve is what ‘most any sum of multiple random processes will inevitably converge towards.
I believe that if a sparce smattering of Trump votes randomly came “out of nowhere” (like lightning striking in a particular area, say), we should expect their occurrences to follow the “Poisson distribution.” FWIW.

I cannot accept a run of 135,000 consecutive votes for Biden. That’s like flipping a coin 135, 000 and each time it comes up heads.
Never going to happen

True. “some things are so improbable that they never actually happen.” Such as a hot cannonball falling into a bucket of water and having the water molecules eject it back to the same height without cooling it. That kind of improbable.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.