Freudian slip ?
Did SolarWinds Make the Right Move in Hiring Former CISA Director Christopher Krebs?
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3925598/posts
If you consider this hire in relation to the history on this thread, in which Freepers (because targeted) exposed the bigger hack underlying the Solar Winds partial exposure... and see it mostly in relation to the “social hacking” element in particular...
Q: Why would anyone hire a guy who was exposed as being the most clueless... in an attempt to restore “integrity” lost due to that exact cluelessness ?
A: Because it suggests the only failure they recognize having occurred... was in getting caught.
Yes, events post “Solar Winds” suggest more over time that the hack was “Deep State” in origin... not “foreign” and not “domestic”... but “globalist” in origin... that including both foreign and domestic components... including a domestic Advanced Persistent Threat that “lost an asset” in the Solar Winds hack being exposed.
I’ve seen no credible effort being made to address any of the larger issues that were behind enabling the Solar Winds hack... which was only “an instance” of the exploitation of LARGER proven vulnerabilities.
The silence is the definitive answer...