Posted on 11/16/2020 3:47:25 PM PST by Hojczyk
Dresses and skirts come in various lengths and weights and cuts and slts for whatever bending or crouching is needed
But the fact is most modern women today dont do hours of ‘work’ to begin with
So thats probably overestimated to try to make your argument more compelling
And dont forget this also doesnt rule out shorter skirts and leggings for activites/chores that the would make more sense for
Just dont try to pass this of that women ned pants for chores because you all dont do anywhere near the level of chores done by prior women NOT wearing pants
And i believe you are well aware of this
Such an authority. Burka police?
You have nothing so you resort to that. Nice.
Called it like I saw it. And saw no reason to try to explain myself to someone with absolutely no interest in what I think or care about.
I don’t think kilts are dresses. But they are very much okay on a man.
Chiffon, illusion netting, lady looking dresses? Eww. Not okay at all.
Peach
I thought we were discussing a topic, not your personal feelings
I forget, women do this sort of thing when they feel they arent winning a debate
Have a good one
Am i the only one seeing weird square characters in posted articles?
For Exampel “ By and large, most American women donât want to be in a situation where their children ask, âMommy, why is daddy wearing a dress?â weird squ”
Your made the discussion personal when you assumed my workload responsibilities and dictate garment requirements suitable and required for my own needs.
While I was taking the position most women women wear pants out of necessity. And yes convenience. But not to be a man.
I also agreed with Candace Owens that a society full of effeminate man-boys will he the death of that Nation and culture.
Make it about me all you want. I was trying to decline the ridiculous thread pirating of making it about me.
Wrong
I never made it about your specific work personally
I made those comments about modern women as a group
Just as we are talking about other demographics as a group in the discussion, not any particular individual
This is a common tactic however, to take a generalized group statement and take it personally to then shift/deflect off the actual debate and attack the other side with such an accusation
Dan Levy from the zero comedy show ‘Schitt’s Creek’ got all dressed up to celebrate the 2020 Emmy Awards
https://www.insider.com/emmys-dan-levy-kilt-thomas-browne-outfit-2020-9
A woman shall not wear man’s clothing, nor shall a man put on a woman’s clothing; for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God. Deuteronomy 22:5 NASB
Who cares what liberals think about Candace’s statement- We only care what God thinks about the issue- He calls it the strongest thing there is- an ABOMINATION
[[Whatta-bout Kilts?]]
Scotts don’t wear kilts wishing they were women, or to satisfy a perverted sexual fantasy-
Men who dress as women as some form of satisfying a sick twisted deviant mind are an abomination to God
It’s a kilt dagnabit.
Yes a my little pony kilt,so:)
I love this woman.
Don’t tell my wife.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.