Maybe the reason for the differences in the GA and MI filings is due to the knowledge of the witnesses who came forward? For example, maybe the GA case is built more on Republicans who provided statements on what they saw as observers, but MI might have more insider details from Democrats who are higher up the food chain so are ‘in the know’?
I think it was at the PA hearing there was an affidavit from a Democrat who saw what was going on, and their faith in the process has been destroyed. I might have things all twisted in my mind, though. LOL
Difference is: each state is autonomous and has different election laws within the federal format The SOS of each state is in charge of the actual elections (coordinating county clerks) with state laws being determined by state’s legislature. Those laws must comply with national election laws.
No no, I think you have it just right. As you usually do. That makes sense why one state would be different than another, in where they most heavily have the evidence of fraud. I was just wondering why they would be so different and I think you got it
Hope your pies turned out good and that you had a great Thanksgiving.
We had Thanksgiving at my 96 year-old friend’s house. What a marvelous lady. She is so kind and loving to all, I really want to try to be more like her. I think she has so much love to give that the Lord just lets her stay here until her work is done.