It’s not about me believing Sidney or Tucker.
I believe Sidney. I’m just saying as a journalist, Tucker & Byron are stating a fact - Sidney has not presented any information.
Both can be true at the same time. Sidney has the information. Sidney has not presented the information . They are not mutually exclusive statements.
I think the issue is Tucker’s attitude. He is clearly angry about her not giving him any evidence. He tossed her a couple of bones, but he seems to be under the impression that she is REQUIRED to give him the evidence she has, and is in the process of putting together for a very important case.
What came out of the whole thing for me is that Tucker is adamant that Sidney is doing something WRONG by not complying.