Posted on 11/13/2020 3:41:05 AM PST by MtnClimber
Some skepticism is called for when the mainstream media are so uniformly in agreement about anything, let alone about a hotly disputed presidential election.
Few people are gullible enough to believe everything anybody tells them. But how suspicious is it when nearly everybody seems to be telling you the same thing even though you know of obvious exceptions? How about when people flat-out lie and misrepresent?
Whom are you going to believe: the mainstream media or your own lying eyes?
Some skepticism is called for when the mainstream media are so uniformly in agreement about anything, let alone about a hotly disputed presidential election.
"President-elect" is the legal term for the person with 270 or more votes cast in the Electoral College, which doesn't even meet this year to cast those votes until Dec. 14, a month in the future.
Then, and only then, will we have a "president-elect." And maybe not even then if the investigations of corruption in several states haven't concluded and hold up certifying state election results.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
“how did that man necked monster use her ‘womanly ways’ to get to this point?”
She launched on Wille Brown’s old, black rocket. He liked it mighty fine.
Then, she got the $$$ and network support of feminist, leftist and probably Soros groups.
Now, I’ll wager Indian (50%)-American Kamala has strong support from Indians working in Silicon Valley, Big Data, Microsoft, Google, Twitter, etc..
The first woman VP will be an Indian? Akshat’s gonna vote for THAT. (An unmentioned part of this election, ain’t it?).
Indian coders — what can they mess with to influence an election?
Democrats are hypocrites to their bones.
Nope. Their is no "President-Elect" until Congress itself accepts fully the electoral college results and bangs the gavel on January 15th ending the election process. Electoral votes can be challenged in Congress and thrown out.
bookmark
bump
100%
Some skepticism is called for when the mainstream media are so uniformly in agreement about anything ...
Heh.
Down to using the same catch phrases, they are always in agreement.
The USSR wished Pravda was as loyal to their deep state as our press is now.
That's what I think too, but I can also confirm that there are people who take CNN seriously.
His real title is President-Reject Joe Biden ...
Fears the electoral votes the play it safe gig.
They did the same thing with President Obama, giving him the powers of the Presidency right after the election, whereas in the 21st Century, Republicans have had to fight for them, and undo the sabotage of the previous administration.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.