Replies

This connects a couple of other dots... perhaps providing a bit more rational explanation than I’ve seen before about how it could be possible that the Army did in fact take physical action in Frankfurt.

Key bit is in item 9 of his list of “cheats”.

It Was A Steal
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/11/09/it-was-a-steal/

It links the Frankfurt address to direct CIA functions.

Leaves a question about CIA linkages to the Soros Server Farm... and how much other “crossfeed” might exist between access to CIA facilities and Soros’s access to CAI information.

Says our tracking this down and pulling the plug on this is why Esper got fired ?

Ties it in with EU blackmail of the Brits... and Chinese “interest” in lots of things... without showing more about how the wires connect between “interests” and “actions”.

I should point out... my opinion / speculation on the “Army took the servers” story.

I think the two reasons you’d want to take and control the servers physically... would be:

First, it could be about stopping them from functioning. If what is described here does define the function that was controlling the counting machines... that won’t work if you turn them off... or, at least, it may force reconfiguration events that might also be useful to observe and monitor. The voting isn’t (or wasn’t then) done yet ? Will there be (was there) a monitor-able change... when the servers are turned off ? So even that act might generate a forensic input or two as new evidence.

Second, it might be relevant in relation to “evidence” that might be found on the hard drives of those servers... some of which might be very precise and detailed in revealing the organization of the efforts behind it. Having all of that in one place, able to look at it... a lot easier than trying to piece it together from intrinsically incomplete remotely collected data. Divide “evidence” into two categories... that meaning “actionable information” and that meaning “legally relevant”.

My opinion... is that you’d mostly not need the “physical” effort in order to make the key difference required in awareness after the fact...

Just having the location information... with a target that is the origin of the problem... is (was?) probably sufficient to enable “national resources” being applied in “getting all of it”... without having a physical raid take place. Most of it probably already “in hand”... still leaves a difficult problem in sorting it out from everything you have to sort from the flow.

A story like that saying “the Army took it”... might be a simple note sent saying “thanks, we got it all”... or, it could be the opposite meaning in terms of physical control... not being clear it was Trump’s troops vs. Esper’s guys working to cover their tracks... just a bit too late...

Which it is... only controls “the degree” in which the physical capture of direct data structure and control of the on/off switch is a result. Always hard to tell who is who in Spookville ?

Also note contrasts in context of the “laundry list of frauds” post above, with the top line video on ELECTION FRAUD that is being censored by Youtube now:

The video, first, carefully distinguishes between “voter fraud” and “election fraud”...

Atty General Barr announced he was “authorizing” US Attorneys to pursue election fraud issues. Here it is as reported by CBS News... usefully linking to the DOJ manual on election frauds:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/barr-attorney-general-authorizes-attorneys-pursue-allegations-voter-fraud-election/

Note a couple of things first:

One: in “may be conducted if there are clear and apparently-credible allegations of irregularities that, if true, could potentially impact the outcome of a federal election in an individual State.”

That “may” is not directive, so it still allows DOJ looking the other way, even if presented with actionable information, if crooks in DOJ or crooked FBI investigators decide that obvious fraud presented isn’t “credible” in its reporting. Still requires that NO ONE should volunteer to provide information to DOJ preferentially... as they are now “willing to accept” it, when previously they “would not talk to you at all”, ever, including AFTER certifying results. Experience speaking.

Instead, the credibility of accusations should be established by evidence that is presented to the courts WITHOUT first giving it to DOJ.

Get your evidence to Trump’s team. Don’t assume you can trust DOJ to not interfere with efforts in validating proof.

Two: Barr imposes operative limits in any investigation, that preclude looking for ANY conspiracy... as “in an individual state” precludes considering the conspiracies that do exist that will necessarily cross state lines.

The routine in DOJ “looking” at election fraud has always been to ensure not finding it. That’s meant prosecuting too obvious voter fraud... as a cover for aggressively “not looking” at election fraud... and still not seeing it even when its egregious and shoved in their faces.

Three: “nothing here should be taken as any indication that the Department has concluded that voting irregularities have impacted the outcome of any election.” clearly telegraphs the DOJ fallback plan... given that not looking is entirely not credible... is to find “irregularities”... while hoping (trying) to prove they didn’t change outcomes. DOJ will likely be working for the other side... including that investigations they do will likely obstruct and suppress evidence rather than connect dots.

Do not assume ANY of DOJ’s involvement offers an advantage. Barr, at best, is overseeing a nest of vipers, and at worst is still doing his best in defending his own policy... since he WROTE the manual saying to ignore election fraud ?

The Feds finally “acting” (dictionary definition 2: “suitable for stage performance”) only NOW ? Only going to “be there for us”... in time to muck up what others have done while doing DOJ’s job for them ?

And, then... will be addressing LOCAL ONLY election fraud “issues” (NOT the linkages in conspiracies they refuse to look for) after DECADES of standing back allowing... FAR MORE than you know yet ?

DOJ are there to FACILITATE top level crime... as the last four years and the Clinton’s history of success should make CRYSTAL clear... to everyone.

Fully consider that GETTING REAL JUSTICE requires reelecting Trump... and not cooperating with a clearly corrupt DOJ. Once Trump is re-elected... he can fire ALL OF THEM... FOR CAUSE.

They are reacting now... because they’ve been forced... not because they’ve become good guys.

Before noting anything else... note those functions in the stated and unstated LIMITS Barr applied ?

And, its begun:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3904590/posts