The interviewee, Russel Ramsland, is a cybersecurity expert whose company has investigated election fraud.
He first distinguishes between VOTING fraud and ELECTION fraud. VOTING fraud goes on at the precinct and voting center level. It involves manipulation of voting machines, handling of paper ballots, and such. ELECTION fraud is what happens at the county and state levels where results are tabulated and posted to databases for recording, analysis, and reporting.
The video mainly addresses ELECTION fraud. It is based on data gotten from two counties in Texas. He says the data logs show many discrepancies that deserve further investigation. It gets kind of technical, but he shows how the data, once it is posted to the servers, can be manipulated in many ways. He is critical of the lack of security of the system, which is run by a company in Barcelona with data on servers in Frankfurt. He says the entire backend of the system can be manipulated by election officials at the county and state levels, and that it could be hacked by anyone with the technical know-how. He provides examples of how it can be done.
At one point in the video, he shows a news media clip frame-by-frame that clearly show votes being switched from one candidate to another.
He also discusses and shows how the database can be used to compare early and mail-in voting results with election-night results to project the number of votes needed to guarantee a win for a particular candidate.
He says he has tried to show his findings to the FBI and DHS with no success.
Note: His comments are about his research and vulnerabilities of our election systems. Don't confuse his video with Hammer and Scorecard, which appears to be a deep-state tool for hacking into the kind of election system that he describes.
Bookmark
Poke at Russel Ramsland and you’ll soon find he’s a former Republican candidate who lost a primary to Pete Sessions.
I agree with yours: “Don’t confuse his video with Hammer and Scorecard, which appears to be a deep-state tool for hacking into the kind of election system that he describes.”
That’s the reason for my titling the post as I did.
“Hammer and Scorecard”... means “let’s blame the Democrats inside the CIA”...
But, the Scytl information suggests... “this was done by Soros related operatives working out of Europe.”
Or, perhaps those will both turn out to be the same thing, and here they’re just using alternative attack vectors...
But, otherwise... seems like great potential exists to engage in a bit of misdirection in order to misplace the blame ?
If the CIA gave “access” to Hammer and Scorecard to “Democrat operatives”... is there anyone who’d believe that Soros didn’t have them integrated, re-branded and up for sale as a “service” within a day ?
Note that the video on Youtube is now being censored. They won’t allow it being viewed without first signing in.