Should note it here, as others are not...
Barr’s statement on election fraud was not only widely misrepresented... it was also apparently intended upon its issuance as a distraction from other content.
Barr’s statement pointed out not only that he’d appointed Durham as special counsel, back in October... but that he’d narrowed the scope of Durham’s work to focus on Crossfire Hurricane, only.
Commenters have often noted that as “a new threat” to a new Biden Administration... but they have roundly ignored that it also constitutes a direct frontal legal attack on his own institution... even as the FBI scandal that is the public face of Crossfire Hurricane... cannot be isolated from its origins now, when its origins, as well as its conduct, were one of the key reasons that Barr enabled the investigation in the first place.
The question is... if the origins of Crossfire Hurricane... are the same as the origins of election fraud in 2020... would that mean that the Crossfire Hurricane investigation would incorporate consideration of the ONGOING elements in the current continuation of elements of the Crossfire Hurricane OPERATION ?
I don’t think you can answer that question... without a;ready knowing both the origins and the purpose and scope of the directives that were issued that enabled Crossfire Hurricane... and its potential derivatives.
Why is the Senate hearing on Crossfire Hurricane... now discussing the impact of Section 230 on how giant tech companies alter the coverage of the news ?