The simplest fraud to prove.
Reports out of Arizona appear to show that Biden won 130% of Democrat votes... while Trump “won” negative 30% of those votes.
The most obvious explanation is software allocating 1.3 Biden votes for each Biden voter... and .7 Trump votes for each Trump vote.
Reality requires that there is NO POSSIBLE fractional vote.
Votes come in whole integer numbers, only... and they need to be counted, only, and not be “calculated”.
If there is a calculation capacity in the software, beyond what is required to do simple additive math, only... why ?
Show the software counted fractional votes... or smoothed fractional vote totals to whole votes... and there is no other explanation that is possible other than fraud... including that it requires widespread systemic fraud and a conspiracy to defraud the public by conducting a false, fraudulent election... if even a single fractional vote or “calculation” of votes was a part of the process.
The Interlocutory Appeal in the Georgia Federal Case Is Being Filed by Sidney Powell and Lin Wood
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3911671/posts?page=1
An interesting bit of irony...
The Constitutional argument is that the Legislature, and not the Governor or Secretary of State, are the sole authority in determining the “times, places and manner” of the elections.
But, that requirement has been roundly ignored in the run up to this election... with the Secretary of State not being at all shy in telling the counties what they can and cannot do, even when his choices conflict with the plain text of the law.
And, now, the argument is the opposite ? Now the Secretary of State is claiming he CAN’T be expected to tell the counties what to do in elections related matters... even when it is a simple matter of informing them of the emergent need to comply with the law and preserve evidence that a judge has directed must be preserved ?
The one thing that makes clear... is that either way the Secretary of State is going to lose the FUNDAMENTAL argument he’s picked with himself...
I don’t know the Georgia law well enough to know what it does direct in the plain text... in the instance... but, find it pretty hard to believe that it intends to disempower the SoS and prevent the SoS from acting in preserving evidence of fraud ?
Should prove interesting to see this one play out...