Do you suppose that there has been enough evidence right now, that these state election boards and their counting minions may have been given an offer too good to refuse? Something along the lines of “you’ve been caught red handed —clean everything up, call it a “glitch” and then maybe, just maybe, you can avoid federal charges that will keep you locked up for decades”....... Anyone?
Do you suppose that there has been enough evidence right now, that these state election boards and their counting minions may have been given an offer too good to refuse? Something along the lines of youve been caught red handed clean everything up, call it a glitch and then maybe, just maybe, you can avoid federal charges that will keep you locked up for decades....... Anyone?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don’t know but I can assume that the resolution will be made with an eye to the future (e.g., the bad actors/strategies could not be used again). What I do think may happen (for now) is de-escalation.
Remember when the CDC’s Covid-19 numbers were high and getting higher at the same time accounts of their extreme data extortion kept rolling in. Quietly, one piece at a time, the distorted data was corrected and the Covid-19 exaggerations began to shrink. The MSM warned that the reportage was being “politicized” (HA! They slay me!).
When the data was reasonably cleaned of wild “methodology”, suddenly the MSM stopped citing CDC data and launched a PR campaign on behalf of a model (some obscure institute and a university) that featured catastrophic projections.
The day I (and others) had waited for, when Fauci would have the epaulets stripped from his uniform and a pair of white gloves ceremonially struck across his face for his betrayal of the public (saw that in an old movie somewhere)....never happened (*sad face*). Stability of the social fabric was more important than the scene I hoped to witness. The MSM would have ripped the social fabric wide open and strewn the contents from sea to shining sea if the administration had tried to set the record straight about what Fauci, Brix and others have intentionally DONE TO US.
Twitter bannings/take down would have already been enacted way-back-when and we still had use for that service. Same with Rosenstein/Mueller take-down; they were allowed to look like they were resigning. Same with many firings and “job changes”. Stability first.
I am wondering if we’re on track for that here. There HAS to be talk of crimes and stolen election results but they may keep the workings close to their vest and minimize the damage to the social fabric that full exposure, and the MSM’s attacks. Our enemies would love to fan unrest.
So maybe on the surface the resolution of the election impasse will look calmer and more orderly, a nip and tuck there to make the results more “accurate” instead of frog marching shame-faced, treasonous sellouts from the ballot locations (and other gov locales).
President Trump did talk about the crimes being committed against him re the hoax - and stresses it was accurate now, but never (publicly) called for hides....YET. Possibly this election must be over before public displays (orange jumpsuits or epaulets/white gloves) come into play. :)
just maybe, you can avoid federal charges that will keep you locked up for decades....... Anyone?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
good thoughts, db
...keeping an eye on AZ
https://twitter.com/LarrySchweikart
PS: I’ve always assumed Rosenstein, Mueller, George Bush, Jeb Bush etc. DO have legal problems (grand jury indictments) and are spending time in court - but am focusing in my post on what we the public might see about the election “interference”.
Maybe, but it won't work in the long run. People need to see the who and how of electoral corruption. And to see punishment doled out.
Otherwise we will slip right back into the mess we have now.