Posted on 11/05/2020 7:26:51 AM PST by ransomnote
Here are excerpts from some great FR posts by Political Junkie Too:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3902435/posts?page=123#123
Georgia Democrats are ballot-stuffing. Here is the evidence.
Biden got 98,158 MORE votes than the highly contested Senate Democrat candidate Jon Ossoff, where $100 million was spent on his race.
Trump got 1,071 LESS votes than the Republican Senate candidate David Perdue.
Why would Georgia Democrats vote for Biden and skip the Senate race when taking control of the Senate was a primary goal?
Furthermore, in the House races, Trump got 28,711 LESS votes than all the Republican House candidates, while Biden got 79,395 MORE votes than the Democrat House candidates.
It looks like there are at least 79,000, and possibly 100,000 Biden votes with no corresponding House or Senate vote.
Democrats stuffed the Georgia ballot box with 100,000 Biden-only ballots.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3902419/posts?page=73#73
This pattern is repeated in Wisconsin vs. the House races. Biden has 100,000 more votes than the total Democrat House candidates, versus Trump being 4,434 short.
AJ is MOSSAD, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Clowns World-wide, LLC.
**************************
Wishful thinking on my part Cletus. Desperately looking
for anything positive.
:: new congress is sworn in Jan 3, 2021 ::
Maybe?
They’ll keep “counting” until it’s outside that margin for an auto-recount.
But, the current congress is dissolved by the calendar.
What gets sworn in on 03JAN might not be the congress in place on 20JAN?
That was excellent. I hope de Blasio is surrounded by that whenever he goes in public.
Thanks for posting that thread. I’m going to try to collect the drops later with live links.
Very good!
Thanks for the ping.
I checked it out. It looks plausibly legit. If there were any signs of speculation or hoax play, I wouldn’t say it looked plausibly legitimate.
However, this is a leak of sorts and I question this sort of channeling of what seems to be classified information.
If the sting is not just plausibly legitimate but actually legitimate, there would be court filings perhaps under seal with warrants for arrest issued. I don’t think leaks would be made if it’s a military op.
There are questions of legitimate authority, by what authority does the President’s EO extend to ballot design selection? The answer is National Security. Ballots like currency must have shape and form with choices for watermarks and color/tint. This should fall under anti-counterfeit measures for election ballots.
States must have signed an agreement to comply (my speculation). If traitors were in state positions of authority for agreeing to compliance, they would have gladly signed the agreement after thinking the ballots were easy to counterfeit. This was the lure. Comply and cheat at the same time, or so they would think.
The choices were given to Secretaries of States and were provided by DHS as a measure of compliance with National Security orders.
A Chinese spy group would see how easy it would be to counterfeit chosen designs, watermarks, color/tint as the specifications were explicit in the choices given.
It appears that DHS retained the sole authority to make the paper ballots according to the choices made by states. The watermark choices were to lure in states to think this was a security requirement by DHS and must be complied with.
This was key. It was critical to get states to comply and at the same time to let Chinese spy and other enemy groups think the ballot features were easy to counterfeit.
But DHS secretly added more features such as non-radioactive isotopes (chemical tracers) that states were unaware of.
Here’s a synopsis of what went down:
1. DHS under the President’s EO for national security worked from 2017 through 2020 to bring states into ballot compliance based on National Security orders.
2. States took delivery of federally produced ballots and agreed to use only these federal ballots to be in compliance meanwhile thinking they were easy to defeat through counterfeit printing.
3. The President spoke in public warning that China was going to counterfeit tens of millions of ballots and attempt to steal the election.
4. The actual federal ballots were discernible and traceable from the counterfeit ballots.
Now questions are how would this emerge and be seen as a legitimate prosecution? How does DOJ and the Administration retain moral authority in the face of accusations made against them of interference and partisan motives?
If it’s taken to court and proven, the accused will have their day in court.
If all the above is accurate, we should have an announcement by DOJ soon.
THanks for the correction.
The problem is going to be PA...and States and U.S.Constitutional deadlines and Judges - local & SCOTUS.
The RATs will, of course, try to run out the clock i.e. the Dean Smith 4-corners offense.
It’s going to be in the 70’s here today and I have a coveted tee-off time.
So I will be out doing some landscraping for a while.
Hold down the fort til this evening and “Don’t nobody bring me no bad news”.
Also they started a voter fraud commission but the Democrat governors wouldn’t cooperate cuz they want to cheat so Trump turned it over to the department of Homeland security
so instead of a toothless little commission of governors and bureaucrats he gave it to a federal law enforcement division with prosecutorial and investigative powers,
“”In his executive order, however, Trump didn’t shut down the investigation or acknowledge that voter fraud is a non-issue, as his critics had demanded. Instead, he turned the investigation over to the Department of Homeland Security, a cabinet-level agency that has access to much of the data the commission requested but couldn’t get from the states.
The move triggered alarms among voting and civil rights advocates, who point out that the commission’s work — which many on the left viewed as a pretext for a new round of voter-ID laws — can now continue behind closed doors, exempt from open meetings and public-records laws.””
“Its going to be in the 70s here today and I have a coveted tee-off time.”
Same here, except I’m going flyfishing at the beautiful Gunnison river.
If the watermarked ballots story is true, we should hear something about it today. No need to keep it secret. The Dems are in the process of stealing the election, now they have to be stopped.
I got through about 10 minutes from 11:30 mark on. Weird. Would you please share the gist of what it is about it that most of us need?
Cue is on it.
You are living in an alternate reality.
“When the smoke clears, Biden should increase outside the margin for an automatic recount.”
Isn’t that convenient ... just like Michigan ... just enough votes to prevent triggering a recount.
I’m sure they would have done the same in Wisconsin had they not underestimated Trump’s support there.
When you have to generate 100,000 Biden votes quickly, there's only time to fill in one bubble.
Anyone know the process ($$$) involved to obtain a recount in those States if the “auto-correct” doesn’t kick in?
Thinking way back, this was the issue with Gore in 2000.
He didn’t want to pay for a State-wide recount because his campaign was “broke”.
He had enough to pay for the Big 2 recount.
Trump may be flush enough to pay for one or both.
And if he pays, what authority does he have in the “who” and “why” of the counting?
:: Thinking way back, this was the issue with Gore in 2000. ::
S/B “...an issue...”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.